ESSENTIAL DIGNITIES PART
4
*
_______The Use of
Essential Dignity and Debility_______
There are two
basic applications in the practice of analysing the astrology of a
horoscope:
* to qualify the essential symbolic nature and condition of any
celestial body within the
chart.
* to qualify the relationship of a planet to other components of the
horoscope – other planets, houses and
signs.
Regarding the qualifying of the further nature of a
planet
Essential dignity and
debility are significant of whether the core archetype of any planet can
function with an ease, or conversely, with a great requirement for adaptation
and change in its typical mode of expression. The core template of the symbolism of
any celestial body, its ‘zodiacal condition’ (and conditioning) is further
reflected by sign placement.
As
must be generally clear by now, a planet in essential dignity is in affinity,
inferring a basic smoothness of function.
Traditionally the ‘benefic’ planets (Venus and Jupiter) were given an
increase in their potential boons and the traditional ‘malefics’ (Mars and
Saturn), when in dignity were considered to be less prone to becoming
problematic in their
expression.
This symbolic reasoning is logical, as
in dignity a planet and a sign are naturally attuned in harmony, which is
supporting to archetypal strength and comfort. To offer an illustration: the
Moon in its domicile dignity of Cancer is obviously greatly strengthened in
essential nature. The Moon in
Cancer is thus functioning from a basis of nocturnal, cold, moist thematic, that
is, it can be very ‘lunar’ and fulfil such kind of analysis.
The Moon within its detrimented
sign of Capricorn is now within a cold/dry Saturnian template and within the
further template of a cold, dry, earth sign[19].
In this detriment the Moon’s essential cold/moist nature is much
compromised, in the sense that it is rendered very cold and its moisture is
desiccated. The Moon in Cancer is
archetypally sound, whilst in Capricorn it is archetypally unsound. Whether this is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ is not
really the point, it is just the Moon is not very ‘lunar’ (in a ‘saturnine’
manner) when in her detriment and thus will not be naturally reflective of the
normally expected lunar symbolisms.
The sign thus may become as a planets
crucible, or arena of alchemising.
Traditionally a planet in so-nominated ‘good’ zodiacal condition (strong
dignity) will always possess some variety of a ‘gifted’ aspect, to whatever
degree or context (and whether this is embraced, empowered, or not).
Reciprocally, it is also
maintained that a planet in so-called ‘bad’ zodiacal condition, as to what it
may symbolise, will always be seen to promote some form of ‘care’, no matter how
positive its degree of ensuing function.
This view honours the depth of the integral nature of general archetypal
premise, in itself a vast discussion, well beyond the constraints of these
notes.
Having put forth all of
these statements, what is being addressed here is the essential nature of a
planet/sign relationship. It must
further be borne in mind, that off this fundamental astrological partnering,
there are other things that will further mitigate, support and modify what is
essentially stated. That is, other
planets, aspectual relationships, accidental dignities and so on. Thus it may be seen that it is of an
importance to ascertain the essential nature, power and temperament of any
astrological body.
By its sign
placement and zodiacal condition, once the core nature of a planet in a
horoscope has thus been further defined, an extension of delineation can then
have a further clarity of foundation from which to
emerge.
Regarding the relationship between
a planet and other chart components
Once all of the basic ‘building blocks’
of an astrological chart are understood, as individual units within the overall
construction (i.e.; the signs, houses, planets and aspects). The ‘art’ in the practice of astrology
then truly begins to open to a more philosophically creative level.
This can begin in spotting and
synthesising the interrelationship that the various dimensions of a horoscope
may have with one another. It is
through the mechanism of a planet ‘holding dignity’, in the ultimate to varying
degrees with any sign, which may offer keys to the doors of a greater
astrological exploration.
Thus aside from contributing to the
character of a planet within a horoscope, the signs are as symbolic
intermediaries, serving to create a relation between a planet and other birth
chart components.
Thus if
the sign of Cancer were on the 2nd house cusp in a birth chart, the
Moon, domicile lord of this sign, would be said to ‘have dignity’ with, or be
the ‘dignified lord’ of the 2nd house.
In addition, if for example the planet Mercury was in the sign of Cancer,
by the same reasoning, the Moon would have dignity over Mercury. A planet may be regarded as having a
‘landlord’, or ‘backup’, which is this domicile lord of its natal sign of
positing. The Moon would also be
said to be ‘receptive’ to Mercury in Cancer, as the little planet is ‘wearing
the cloth’ of the nocturnal light and is tinged with lunar tones.
Today the more informal and
common terminology would tend to speak of the Moon as ‘ruling’ the
2nd house, or the Moon would be the ‘ruler’ of Mercury. Nevertheless, it must be noted that the
expression ‘ruler’, is certainly of a very loose use (for instance, a planet may
also ‘rule’, or have dignity, by exaltation[20], etc). Through this principle of a planet
holding dignity with a sign, that planet may then relate symbolically and add
its comment to where its sign of dignity may be and to what it, in turn, may
have within its boundaries.
The principle of
planet/sign dignity will allow a planet to relate to a house cusp or another
celestial body. Via this principle,
houses may also be seen to relate to each other, because the lord of one house
(whose sign will be on it), may be contained within another house somewhere else
upon the wheel.
In addition this
principle can be utilised to gain understanding of the delineation of an
apparently ‘empty’ house in a horoscope;
as it will still have one of the twelve signs upon its cusp and thus its
further story may be gathered by the state of its ‘ruler’/domicile lord within
the greater picture. Thus the
principle of essential dignity may allow for a greater synthesis and expansion
of analysis in birth chart delineation.
___The Nature of the Major
Essential Dignities &
Debilities___
Domicile, Exaltation,
Detriment & Fall
The following discussion addresses the
four classifications of domicile, exaltation, detriment and fall, as these are
the major categories of essential dignity and debility. They are no doubt, a very important and
primary dimension of basic astrological understanding, as in knowing the
symbolic utilisation of the zodiac.
It must be noted that some planets, due to having essential dignity by
sign placement, may be ‘all dressed up’, on the apparent level, but ‘not going
anywhere’ (even though always inherently of a ‘strong’ potential). Others may present from the apparent
challenge of debility, yet, should also not always be judged ‘by their cover’,
as ‘rough diamonds’ do happen (nevertheless, in some sense, something must
usually always be ‘cared for’).
In other words, a planet in a sign and
the essential condition, although of importance, is always open to further
development and adulteration, the horoscope depending In addition, there is more leeway of
context and mode of expression, in today’s world, allowing for the awareness of
‘greys’ within the symbolism. Thus,
the components in any horoscope, although always retaining a core nature, may
become subject to other chart conditions.
For this reason, the debilitated can experience a certain reframing, as
can the dignified.
Further variances may
occur, even though a planet and its sign of residence, is of a primary
importance. A planet in a sign is a
major statement in itself, yet still relatively general, in regards to the
further details of delineation to be sought. This is as the basic symbolic foundation
of the combination is still open to be further developed, as a more
individualised analysis. That is
chart positioning, thus possible accidental dignities, such as house, angles, or
other planets and their relationships/aspects and so on, will also add an
extension, to the statement of the fundamental planet/sign
astrology.
Again, the
individual ingredients must be discerned and reflected upon, until a more
extensive understanding may be attempted to be apprehended. The sign placement of a planet qualifies
this essential ‘zodiacal’ (thus ‘extra-archetypal’) condition – or adds more
detail, to the bottom line template from which the purity of a planetary
archetype may function.
Domicile[21]__________
Often known simply as ‘dignity’ or
‘rulership’ in the more informal sense, domicile rulership is the strongest
category of dignity and concerned with giving a planet strength of
archetype. As already identified, a
planet has a sign(s) in which it is considered to be ‘domus’, or ‘at home’[22].
To the ancient astrologer, a planet in its domicile was like a ‘king
enthroned’, or within his own stronghold.
Thus it is noted that a planet within such a dignity is as its
own ‘captain’, usually prepared to function with some manner of individual
integrity and thus may be prepared to naturally pilot the strength of a more
typical expression. The planetary
component in question is symbolised as carrying the fortitude, of an ideally
positive potential, at least concerning its essential symbolic template. When in domicile the planet, or light,
concerned may become strongly harmonised with the tone of the zodiacal sign,
ideally finding a base of symbolic integration and therefore a sound quality of
archetypal expression.
In
domicile placement, the zodiacal environment is ‘familiar’ to the planet and
supposedly ‘serving’ its symbolic essence.
Most ideally, as to what is
being represented, the advantage of something being on its ‘home ground’ is a
naturally familiar, validating and supporting experience. A planet in its domal position was
considered strengthened or potent in its archetypal principles, for ill or
good.
Although in the astrological
tradition, usually any potential maleficence concerning the planet in domicile,
may be seen to be salved, to some degree.
Traditionally and generally, being in astrological domicile appeared to
be as a very fortunate positing, promising a certain grace of the cosmos, as in
being supportive.
Classically some form of ‘gift’/fulfilment concerning
the archetypal function may also be potentially indicated. Whatever the domicile, or the dignity,
the core nature of the planet in question, will maintain its central typos and
thus also be of a great contribution in ‘affecting’ the nature of what is
symbolised. When planet is ‘domus’,
it may be seen to be within its own archetypal/symbolic frame of reference, thus
being generally supported, for what it is, within a comfortable reinforcing
boundary (i.e.; sign).
Such
a planet may be said to be ‘disposing’ of itself, or giving of itself its own
disposition, thus the consideration that it is ‘noble’, self-responsible, or
possessive of esteem in inherent character. For
the astrologer, once a very dignified planet is identified, the task then
unfolds, as to how and where, this symbolism may further express itself, or not,
given its further relationship to the greater holism of the picture.
Exaltation__________
The exaltation positions of
the traditional planets are as follows, also listed with the sign and the
degrees of exaltation;
Planet Sign of
Exaltation Exalted
degree
Sun Aries
19 degrees
Moon Taurus
3
degrees
Mercury Virgo
15
degrees
Venus
Pisces
27
degrees
Mars Capricorn
28
degrees
Jupiter
Cancer
15
degrees
Saturn Libra 21
degrees
Whether at an exact
degree of its exaltation, or given this dignity simply by sign placement, this
classification is second only in the rating of its power to that of domicile.
There is no duality of sign assignation in this system of dignity and in
addition not all of the zodiac are assigned the capability for exalting a
planet, or light. Such are the
points that have prodded astro-historians into postulating it being an older
system than that of the dual domicile type.
When dissected the degrees and
signs of exaltation appear to form no clear logical pattern, as does the system
of domicile. Many other concepts exist regarding ideas of origin. For instance, these degrees of
exaltation are said to be based upon prominent heliacal phenomena of ancient
importance, or upon other facets concerning the nature of declination.
It is likely that the foundation
of exaltation is more philosophical and abstracted in its original seeding, and
then only strictly relating to technical phenomena, as astrology is also a
system of gnosis. All hypotheses
aside, concerning the doctrine of exaltation, the final answer is like much of
the bedrock doctrines of astrology, the actual point of invention is lost in the
veils of time.
GO TO PART 5 of
ESSENTIAL DIGNITIES
Organic Divination for the
Urban Jungle
Thank you for visiting Earth Elephant Astrology
Contact: elephant@earthlyreturns.com
Copyright:Earth Elephant Astrology
2006-2008